Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy made the rounds on the Sunday morning talk shows this week. And his appearances delivered some truly wild moments.

In a pair of interviews with Dana Bash on CNN and Chuck Todd on NBC, the businessman — whose upstart candidacy made him the target of his competitors at Wednesday evening’s debate — confronted both hosts, made outrageous claims, and produced a collection of abnormal moments which dominated the headlines Sunday morning.

Here are the highlights:

1. Bash Battles Ramaswamy for Comparing Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) to a “Modern Grand Wizard” of the KKK

The CNN anchor pressed Ramaswamy about comments at a recent event — during which he claimed Pressley spoke “the phrases of the brand new grand wizards of the modern KKK” again in 2019 when she stated, “We don’t need any further black faces that don’t need to be a black voice. We don’t need any longer brown faces that don’t wish to be a brown voice.”

“How, in any way, are the views you’re talking about comparable to the views and atrocities committed by way of the KKK?” Bash requested.

“What I stated is the grand wizards of the KKK can be proud of what they would hear her say,” Ramaswamy answered. “As a result of there’s nothing more racist than announcing that your pores and skin color predicts something about the content of your viewpoints or your ideas.”

“You didn’t simply say they would be proud,” Bash stated, firing back.. “You mentioned these are the words of the up to date grand wizards of the modern KKK.”

2. Ramaswamy Confronted With Comment About White Supremacists Being as Uncommon a Unicorns

There used to be another latest remark about race on which Bash confronted Ramaswamy. The CNN anchor performed a observation from Friday wherein Ramaswamy said, “I’m positive the bogeyman white supremacist exists somewhere in America, but I’ve by no means met him. By no means seen one. By no means met one in my existence. Possibly I’ll meet a unicorn . And maybe these exist too.”

The presidential candidate responded by means of arguing most current-day racism in The usa “has come from the up to date left.”

three. Ramaswamy Pressed on Why He’s Running for President, Given He Thinks Trump was once the Easiest President of the twenty first Century

Ramaswamy made the declare, at Wednesday night’s debate, that he believes former President Donald Trump was an appropriate president of the 21st century.

Given that place, Chuck Todd asked Ramaswamy an entirely logical query.

“In the event you consider Donald Trump is the best president of the 21st century … why are you running towards him?”

Ramaswamy used to be imprecise in his reply — pronouncing “I consider I can take the The usa First agenda even additional than Donald Trump did,” but failing to tricky beyond some imprecise claims about his electability.

four. Ramaswamy Tries to Sidestep Accusation that He Known as Trump a ‘Sore Loser’

The upstart candidate’s constantly transferring positions have drawn extra scrutiny as he’s risen within the polls. And indeed, Todd confronted Ramaswamy on a remark which gave the look to be all about Donald Trump.

“‘No person likes a sore loser,’” Todd said, quoting from Ramaswamy’s book, printed just remaining yer. “‘That’s probably the most worst sufferer complexes of all.’ Are you relating to Donald Trump?”

“I referred in that chapter each to Stacey Abrams and to Donald Trump,” Ramaswamy spoke back.

But Todd confronted the candidate with another of his own charges:

“The Republican Celebration seems to be shifting in opposition to the position that any races it wins are professional and any it loses had been stolen. It’s simply the preferred conservative brand of victimhood, a knee-jerk kind of sore dropping more widespread to playgrounds than great republics.”

“Chuck, I stand by way of everything I said,” Ramaswamy replied. ?That was a e-book where 11 of the 12 chapters were dedicated to various left-wing victimhood in this u . s .. However it will were incomplete for me to not name out my very own tribe. And my level is I don’t wish to see this in terms of pink versus blue.:

5. Ramaswamy Makes an Totally Outrageous Declare About the Scope of Mike Pence’s Powers on Jan. 6

Finally, the topper. Ramaswamy used to be confronted with a question he did not solution at Wednesday evening’s debate — whether or not he believed former Vice President Mike Pence’s actions on Jan. 6 were right.

“I’d have completed it very differently,” Ramaswamy mentioned. “I feel that there was once a ancient chance that he neglected to reunite this united states in that window. What I would have stated is, ‘This is a second for a true nationwide consensus,’ where there’s two components of what’s required for a functioning democracy in The usa. One is steady elections, and the 2nd is a peaceful transfer of power. When these things come into war, that’s a chance for heroism. right Here’s what I would have said, ‘We want single-day voting on Election Day. We’d like paper ballots, and we want executive-issued ID matching the voter file. And if we achieve that, then now we have completed victory, and we should not have any further grievance about election integrity.’”

“So what would you have got done as Mike Pence?” Todd requested.

Ramaswamy replied with an outrageous claim vastly overstating the powers of the vice presidency — arguing Pence should have unilaterally overturned the election and implemented nationwide balloting reform.

“So, in my capability as president of the Senate, I would have led thru that stage of reform, then, on that situation, certified the election results, served it as much as the president, President Trump then, to signal that into law, and on January seventh, declared the reelection marketing campaign pursuant to a free and honest election,” Ramaswamy stated. “I think that was a neglected possibility.”

Watch above, via CNN and NBC.

The post 5 Wildest Moments of Vivek Ramaswamy’s Sunday Convey Blitz – Including the Bonkers Declare Pence May’ve Carried out Nationwide Vote casting Reforms on Jan. 6 first seemed on Mediaite.