Between a botched report on Benghazi and giving a principally uncritical platform for NSA officials to answer critics of the company, 2013 has no longer been an excellent 12 months for 60 Minutes. New York Times reporter David Carr determined to deal with, head-on, the precise problem with the NSA report, and managed to speak to the reporter at the back of it, John Miller, who had some tough phrases for critics of his piece.

Carr’s major level of rivalry with Miller’s report is that typically, journalists are alleged to method these stories with a wholesome dose of skepticism, however that skepticism used to be nowhere to be discovered when Miller, who up to now served within the Place of business of the Director of National Intelligence, walked during the doorways of the NSA building in Fortress Meade.

In speaking to Miller, Carr describes him as brushing aside critics “as ankle-biting, agenda-ridden bloggers who may not be compelled to get out of their pajamas and do precise reporting.” And the hits simply saved on coming.

“I fully reject the criticism from you and others,” he instructed me. “The N.S.A. story has been a somewhat one-approach communicate. There was no conversation and when you do hear from the N.S.A., it is in a terse, highly vetted commentary.”

“We went there, we requested every query we wished to, listened to the answers, followed up as we wished, and our target audience can come to a decision what and who they consider. As we built it, the N.S.A. used to be a narrative about a debate, no longer a villain, and we delivered to that debate with vital knowledge. I fail to understand how a shrill argument for the sake of constructing televised drama would have comprehensive the rest.”

After all, Miller’s argument that the NSA hasn’t been able to out its aspect of the story impressed some brand-new criticism on Twitter.




That you may read Carr’s full column right here.

[photograph via screengrab]

– –

Practice Josh Feldman on Twitter: @feldmaniac