In light of the controversies going through the Obama administration (Benghazi, IRS, AP vs. DOJ), one of the crucial president’s critics have felt the problems undermine the “big government” ideology of the left. The topic made its solution to Chris Wallace‘s panel on Fox News Sunday panel this weekend, where Kirsten Powers begged to fluctuate.

To that time, Brit Hume referred to that the administration’s safeguard in each of the scandals has basically been to argue incompetence and note that they screwed up. That’s precisely what undermines the enormous executive argument that types the “core” of liberalism.

“When you have simultaneously three scandals affecting different companies of government, completely different individuals, and the White House — and it’s all chalked up to bungling — it in reality diminishes the argument for that facet of the political divide,” Hume contended.

Powers wasn’t shopping for it. Agreeing with the president that the government is usually a pressure for good, she countered, “I don’t suppose any of that is an argument in opposition to liberalism.”

“These are all — it’s unhealthy conduct by individuals in the govt,” she introduced, citing Benghazi for example. “That is specific to the administration mishandling something.”

She further pushed again against the chatter concerning the IRS’ involvement in Obamacare, noting that it’s no longer expansive and doesn’t mean the agency shall be overseeing our well being care.

“It’s a story a good way to work with people who want that to be the narrative,” she argued. “When Obama came in, there already was once no belief within the govt. … He was coming in already with a very, very heavy raise.”

Have a look, by means of Fox: