President Joe Biden won’t be doing an interview with Fox News in advance of Super Bowl LVII. Is it as a result of Fox News is simply too evil to be fair? Is it as a result of Biden is simply too previous to do smartly? Is it because of stipulations, scheduling, or a disagreement on venue or the particular Fox property?
Nah.
On Friday, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre tweeted the information that there could be no televised tête-à-tête, pronouncing “Fox Corp has requested for” an interview with little-known streaming service Fox Soul to be cancelled.
However that isn’t the whole story. In fact the bickering and arguing about who cancelled whom is extensive.
The principle factor to know is that as late as this morning the fate of the interview used to be unknown, however reviews that Fox News had lost “hope” ran wild. It wasn’t until Jean-Pierre’s tweet that hell broke free.
Now the interview on Sunday — which has not yet been known as a Tremendous Bowl interview and we do not know whether can be carried throughout the printed — is again on.
For now, as a minimum. And not with Fox Information.
CNN’s Oliver Darcy said he doesn’t take into account why the White House is taking part in games right here when they might just as an alternative give an explanation for their reasons for keeping off Fox Information, however that’s a rhetorical observation I think. Because it’s lovely obvious what recreation they’re enjoying and why.
Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher noted that White House assistance spox Ian Sams simply this week put out a memo describing House GOP investigations as “the Fox Information reboot of the Home Un-American Actions Committee.”
That’s the messaging the White House bitterly clings to in almost all issues, with Biden robotically bashing Fox Information as most of the media and its on-line cheer squad gleefully join in.
Taking it as a hypothetical, absent identifiers, it turns into slightly extra clear. Think about a president familiar with favorable press and demonstrably averse to tough questions who needs to steer clear of being put in a decent spot however knows it’ll appear to be conspicuous avoidance to cancel a traditional trip outright. What may that president do to steer clear of that conundrum? What may she or he do to cleanly circumvent that singularly difficult outfit altogether?
We heard again and again right through Donald Trump’s White House stay that he “demonized” the press, kept away from difficult questions, or even was straight up afraid to face tough interviewers like, um, Don Lemon.
However that’s no longer a thought the clicking would go with the flow for Biden dodging Fox News. Fingers will point at the hosts or the slant, the protection or the birthday party, however by no means to Biden just being terrified of a tough question. Regardless of his voluminous physique of work within the “yelling at reporters” genre.
Ask yourself if there may be any place in all of media that Biden would get a grilling like Republicans can predict any day of the week. One like this.
However of course, that wouldn’t even be the case. As a result of if Joe Biden sat down with the very skilled and well-respected Bret Baier, for instance, for the traditional pre-Super Bowl interview. It might have been more just like the Margaret Brennan interview of Donald Trump ahead of Tremendous Bowl LIII, somewhat than the Hannity interview of Trump before Super Bowl LIV, but it wouldn’t have been like that Chuck Todd clip linked above.
The fact that Fox has important or even very critical coverage of Biden will not be a motive any media outlet should settle for as a cause of him not to do it. And the shortage of very important protection of Biden on many of the entire rest of the media — except inasmuch as they criticize him from the left — is an excellent reason for him to do it.
CNN analyst Kirsten Powers on Friday mentioned there is no “upside” in doing an interview with Fox News prior to the Tremendous Bowl, “making an allowance for what Fox has change into.” She used to be no longer persuaded by using the argument that Biden might reach Americans he may now not otherwise attain.
Once more it raises the query of the place he could go to be outdoor his partisan cocoon. But it also raises an even more pressing query.
Biden’s handlers and surrogates and fans are repeatedly talking about how sharp and focused he’s, they fawn over his studly manhandling of the susceptible and pathetic Republicans, and how expertly he and KJP care for the clicking and particularly Peter Doocy of Fox News, who manages to ask difficult questions within the briefing room without resorting to what we in the industry name “Acosta antics.”
So one has to wonder what Kirsten Powers would say is the downside to doing the interview? If he’s so adept, if the bad guys are so clearly bad, what is the downside? That he’d express them up? Shouldn’t they include the chance for him to whoop ass, to show up Fox, to struggle the beast and win?
For those who purchase their pre-emptive depiction of any Fox Information interview as an train in evil then it seems a stark admission that he can’t deal with the heat.
But don’t purchase the depiction anyway. The interview would’ve been positive. Simple sufficient. He almost certainly would have shared amusing or two with whoever was conducting it, talked about the sport some. It will’ve long gone nice.
And that often is the worst result of all. Because what they are actually trying to steer clear of is letting Fox News look like news.
He wasn’t turning down the interview as a result of folks would see the real him, but as a result of it might demystify their boogeyman. And THAT often is the greatest PR catastrophe of all.
The put up Biden Bailing on Fox News Super Bowl Interview is Dangerous, In fact, and Most definitely Wasn’t Done For the Reasons You Suppose first regarded on Mediaite.