CNN truth-checker Daniel Dale and anchor Abby Phillip ripped through a sequence of former President Donald Trump’s falsehoods minutes after what Phillip called a “very pleasant” different on Fox Information.

Fox News host Laura Ingraham moderated a town corridor with Trump Tuesday night in South Carolina days beforehand of that state’s main, the place Trump leads ex-Amb. Nikki Haley in her residence state by way of roughly one country mile. Fox is webhosting a Haley city corridor later within the week.

On Tuesday evening’s version of CNN NewsNight, Phillip described Fox as “at ease territory” as she introduced Dale to guide her via a fact-check of Trump claims that turned out to be (spoiler alert) false:

PHILLIP: Tonight, Donald Trump returning to relaxed territory, facing questions at an extraordinarily friendly city corridor on Fox News. No surprises there. He’s making some claims that aren’t all there.

CNN’s Daniel Dale joins me now with a truth test of what Trump mentioned and what’s in fact real in it. Let’s start with the claim about Ukraine. Let’s pay attention.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: First thing I get on the cellphone is with the European countries who are in of 25 % of what we’re in.

We’re in for over $200 billion. They’re in for $35 billion.

INGRAHAM: It’s been about $a hundred billion up to now, but it is going to be $160.

TRUMP: It’s a distinction of $150 billion. They’ve bought to start paying up.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: So, Daniel, what’s happening there, actually?

DANIEL DALE, CNN REPORTER: Abby, those numbers appear pulled out of skinny air. They’re not even as regards to genuine. In keeping with one reputable tracker of assist to Ukraine, the Kiel Institute, which is based in Germany, is actually E.U. nations and E.U. establishments which might be some distance outpacing the U.S. in terms of assist commitments to Ukraine, $156 billion for the E.U. starting in 2022 around when the war started, to $73 billion to the U.S.

Now, those are commitments, now not allocations, now not actual spending. If you look at actual spending, it’s nearer, however even then, Abby, the E.U. outpaces the USA.

PHILLIP: There’s also, Daniel, a claim that Trump made about the Nord Move 2 pipeline. Let’s take heed to that too.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: I went in, bought in, and I ended Nord Flow 2. Most people don’t understand what that — that’s the Russian pipeline, crucial economic deal-plus, I name it financial-plus, far more than economic, ever. I stopped it. I advised Germany you’re now not having it. I told all of Europe you’re no longer having it. Anyone that wants to have it, they’re now not dealing with you. I stopped it.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

PHILLIP: What are the info in that one?

DALE: You hear this quite a bit from former President Trump that he ended or killed the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. It is usually now not proper. What Trump if truth be told did, Abby, was approve sanctions on some of the companies working on the undertaking.

However right here’s the important factor. He most effective did that about three years into his presidency, when the pipeline was already about 90 % achieved. And even after he imposed those sanctions, the Russian state-owned company in the back of the pipeline stated, ok, high-quality, we’ll simply full it ourselves.

And prior to Trump left place of job in December 2020, they announced that construction was once resuming. Germany announced in January 2021, once more, prior to Trump left place of business, that they had been renewing permission for building of their waters. So whatever he advised Russia, Europe, Germany, he didn’t kill that pipeline.

PHILLIP: Yes, despite what he adamantly says falsely.

Seem, there’s any other subject that he retains coming again to. This time, it’s the categorised paperwork scenario at Mar-a-Lago. Let’s hearken to that one as well.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: Bush took them, all and sundry, Reagan took them out, everyone took them out. It most effective was a massive topic after I took things out. The variation is I had what’s known as the Presidential Information Act. I used to be allowed to do what I did, absolutely allowed. That’s why they handed the act in 1978.

First of all, I didn’t have at hand them over, but, 2nd of all, I might have completed that. We were speaking, after which all of a sudden they raided Mar-a-Lago.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

PHILLIP: Once again, confidently declaring things that are true or false, Daniel?

DALE: This is like upside-down imaginary historical past. I counted at the least four inaccurate claims in that short segment. So, number one, Reagan and Bush didn’t take categorised documents dwelling. Actually, the National Archives debunked this declare ultimate yr when Trump made it then. He was no longer allowed to take these documents. It is in black and white in the Presidential Data Act that all professional data belong to the federal government after a president leaves place of business.

Allowing a president to take paperwork, classified paperwork, home was once no longer why this act was passed in 1978. In truth, it was once the alternative. The act was passed to make it possible for the federal government, the individuals, owned presidential data, in contrast to when Richard Nixon tried to take them home and destroyed some of them.

And then the ultimate claim that, you understand, we had been speaking, we had been having friendly chats, and then all of a sudden the FBI raided Mar-a- Lago. In reality, the FBI search in Mar-a-Lago came more than a yr after the National Archives started its polite asking to check out to get these documents back. So, Abby, it was once no longer even with regards to one thing surprising.

PHILLIP: Sure, I imply, repeated and very politely requesting the documents that belong to the government back.

Daniel Dale, thanks, yeoman’s work as at all times.

Watch above by way of CNN NewsNight.

The submit CNN’s Abby Phillip and Daniel Dale Torpedo Trump Over Falsehoods At ‘Very Pleasant’ Fox News City Corridor first seemed on Mediaite.