U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan on Saturday denied a movement from the attorneys for Donald Trump looking for to have the Monday time limit for responding to the prosecution’s protective order request moved to Thursday, after a flurry of filings from either side.

On Friday, Different Information Jack Smith and his staff filed a motion for the judge to difficulty a protecting order, namely citing a Reality Social post from Trump as part of the foundation for the request. On Saturday, Choose Chutkan issued an order that Trump’s crew must respond to the movement by 5pm on Monday.

A short while later, Trump’s attorney’s filed their own motion asking the closing date be moved to Thursday, August 10.

“At roughly 6:00 PM on Friday evening, the government e-mailed safety tips its proposed protecting order,” the motion from Trump’s attorneys reads.  “The govt entertained no dialogue regarding the content or scope of the Proposed Order, but instead demanded a right away, take-it-or-go away-it response. Hours later, the government filed its movement, Doc. 10 (the “Movement”), asking for the Courtroom undertake the Proposed Order without watching for Defendant’s responsive briefing, contrary to LCrR forty seven and bedrock due process ideas.”

“This morning, the Court docket entered a minute order, directing Defendant to reply by using August 7, 5:00 PM. To make sure information has enough time to prepare a fulsome response, Defendant respectfully requests the Court docket in short lengthen this time table with the aid of three days to allow Defendant’s response by way of August 10, 2023,” it mentioned. “That is drastically much less time than provided for with the aid of LCrR forty seven (generally allowing 14 days to respond to motions) and will allow Defendant to totally examine the Proposed Order and recommend the Court of appropriate law.” (See full record below.)

Now Not long after that, the prosecution made their very own filing in opposition to the request for a extend.

“The Govt wants to offer discovery to the defendant. By means of his movement, the defendant seeks to lengthen that process. The defendant’s movement should be denied,” Smith’s team wrote.  (See full file below.)

And denied it was. Chutkan issued a minute order late Saturday afternoon :

MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Defendant’s 11 Motion for Extension of Time is hereby DENIED. Defendant could continue to confer with the govt relating to its proposed protecting order prior to or after the August 7, 2023 5:00 PM cut-off date for his response. The court docket will resolve whether to time table a hearing to talk about the proposed protective order after reviewing Defendant’s response and, if included, his revised proposed protective order with adjustments in redline. Signed through Choose Tanya S. Chutkan on 08/05/2023

The movement for the extension:

The government’s response to the motion:

Trump’s Fact Social submit that sparked the collection of filings also induced a flurry of media and political responses, including a remark from Trump’s campaign defending his feedback as protected political speech.

The put up DENIED: Decide Shoots Down Trump Try to Extend Closing date For Protective Order Response first appeared on Mediaite.