Justice Correspondent for The Nation Elie Mystal expects the Supreme Court docket beneath Chief Justice John Roberts to strike down part of the Balloting Rights Act this month, announcing that Roberts has at all times been “an enemy of Black individuals vote casting.”

On Black SuperStar Community’s Roland Martin Unfiltered this week, Mystal spoke with host Roland S. Martin about a number of instances simply decided or might be earlier than SCOTUS this month, including on each Affirmative Motion and voting rights.

Mystal mentioned it is “nearly certain” that “the Supreme Court is going to overturn affirmative motion this month,” pointing especially to Justice Clarence Thomas as one of the crucial causes. He then addressed what the court docket will do with recognize to the Vote casting Rights Act.

“I do consider it is extremely likely that the Supreme Court will vitiate Part Two of the Vote casting Rights Act,” he stated. “That’s the component to the Vote casting Rights Act that just allows you to sue for racial discrimination in voting. It’s the kind of normal operational issue of the Vote casting Rights Act, I consider, that’s taking place this term, this month.”

Mystal mentioned that it seems clear Roberts will probably be taking the lead and has “kept that case” for himself, and can write the majority opinion.

Mystal, addressing “mainstream media individuals,” rejected the notion of the Chief Justice as “some kind of average, just right-man affect” on the Courtroom, and as a substitute referred to as Roberts has “been an enemy of Black individuals balloting for his complete prison profession.”

“These are bedrock American ideas that even Republicans trust, however now not John Roberts,” he mentioned. “John Roberts has been our enemy on voting rights for his entire life, and he’s going to continue to be our enemy this month.”

On the balloting rights case, I do believe it is rather likely that the Supreme Courtroom will vitiate Part Two of the Voting Rights Act. That’s the component of the Vote casting Rights Act that just allows you to sue for racial discrimination in vote casting. It’s the roughly normal operational issue of the Voting Rights Act, I believe, that’s going down this term. This month. I imagine John Roberts will write that. Should you take a look at the kind of tea leaves of who used to be written, what case from when, it seems like Roberts has saved that case to himself.

And for all of the folks – all of the media individuals, particularly the entire normally more or less mainstream media people, especially – who are inclined to act like Roberts is a few roughly moderate, excellent-guy influence on the Supreme Courtroom? Make no mistake, John Roberts has been an enemy of Black people vote casting for his complete criminal career. Indeed, his first job after he completed clerking, was once to work for the Reagan White Home, arguing towards a spread to the Vote casting Rights Act that used to be at the beginning that was once eventually pushed through, that was once conceived of via the late Lani Guinier that used to be so widespread that even Ronald Reagan had to sign that enlargement of the Vote casting Rights Act.

The Vote casting Rights Act was once demonstrated under George W. Bush via a voice vote. These are bedrock American rules that even Republicans agree with, but not John Roberts. John Roberts has been our enemy on voting rights for his complete existence, and he’s going to continue to be our enemy this month.

Watch the clip above by way of Roland Martin Unfiltered.

The put up Elie Mystal: Chief Justice Roberts Has All the time Been ‘Enemy of Black Folks Balloting’ first regarded on Mediaite.