Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace interrogated Neera Tanden, president of the Middle for American Progress, on whether or not the Inexpensive Care Act constituted “income redistribution” by way of using higher premiums for youthful individuals to underwrite subsidies for older buyers, whereas with Ethics & Public Policy Center senior fellow James Capretta alleged that Obamacare raises taxes to fund Medicaid subsidies.

“It sounds like what you’re pronouncing is younger people are going to pay extra to subsidize older, sicker people,” Wallace challenged.

“It depends upon their profits, and a whole number of issues,” Tanden mentioned. “A lot of people are seeing a much better deal in this machine. There’s an enormous query about whether youthful folks should in fact have a a lot better deal in the device, because they’re going to get pooled with a variety of other folks.”

“You’re right about income redistribution,” Capretta said. “It’s $250 billion a yr in Medicaid growth and the subsidy structure that’s basically being paid for with the aid of folks on Medicare thru Medicare cuts and a number of tax increases. If you wish to be aware of what the invoice is truly about, people of their most honest and candid moments wil admit that it’s basically taking $250 billion a 12 months out of taxes and Medicare, and moving it into the Medicaid growth and subsidy buildings…It is a large, large income redistribution.”

“It’s just no longer truthful to say they’re not getting a greater health care plan,” Tanden replied. “That’s the problem with the individual market…it’s now not really insurance for a lot of people, because while you get ill, it’s no longer there for you.”

Watch the entire clip below, by way of Fox News:

[Image by way of screengrab]

——
>> Practice Evan McMurry (@evanmcmurry) on Twitter