Fox Information anchor John Roberts covered the dueling statements on Monday from Reps. James Comer (R-KY) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD) – the highest two rating participants of the House Oversight Committee – and noted his confusion at the “contradictory data” coming from the two Congressional leaders.

Comer announced on Monday that he will begin contempt of Congress lawsuits against FBI Director Christopher Wray for refusing handy over a file he alleges outlines monetary crimes by way of the Biden household. Raskin and Comer differed on the current status of an investigation with regards to that record, with Comer claiming an investigation was ongoing, while Raskin argued he understood that the Trump-technology DOJ discovered nothing further to analyze.

Comer: They demonstrated there’s an ongoing investigation
Raskin: I have now not heard that this is a component of any ongoing investigation
Comer: Extremely credible source
Raskin: It is not the exclusive source who’s the beginning of the claim p.c.twitter.com/cyTTJfw1E8

— Acyn (@Acyn) June 5, 2023

“All right. In order that’s Congressman Jamie Raskin, who is the ranking member on the Oversight Committee and seemingly contradictory information coming from him that we heard from the congressman and the chairman of the Oversight Committee, James Comer. Raskin suggesting that that is an outdated report that was once part of a preliminary investigation that didn’t go anyplace. Comer suggesting that this thing’s a bombshell,” an exasperated Roberts defined after enjoying a few of Raskin’s comments.

Particularly, different reviews from recent days backed up Raskin’s claims. NBC Information said Friday, “The FBI and a U.S. lawyer appointed with the aid of then-President Donald Trump reviewed the allegation when it was made in 2020,” including, “The bribery allegation was once now not substantiated.”

“Former Lawyer General William Barr had asked the U.S. attorney in Pittsburgh to research the Biden Ukraine subject,” the file mentioned.

“Yeah, I imply, however as a matter of fact the FBI is refusing handy over the, what they’re pronouncing is an unclassified document, even if they went into a SCIF on the Capitol to view it in order that they’re now not turning it over. And that’s why he said James Comer, they’re initiating this contempt of Congress and will start retaining hearings on Thursday John,” answered anchor Sandra Smith.

“Yeah, bizarre that you’d insist that you just go into a SCIF, which stands for Delicate Compartmented Information Facility, in an effort to view an unclassified document, however they’re seeking to keep it top secret right here. All right. Let’s usher in Fox News contributor, former Assistant US Attorney Andy McCarthy. All right, Andy, he stated/he stated, who do you consider?” Roberts asked, bringing in McCarthy.

“Well, it does sound like they have been at two totally different briefings,” McCarthy started out, noting the dissonance between Comer and Raskin.

“I believe the attention-grabbing questions are whether this is an ongoing investigation. Raskin perceived to say that it wasn’t. Comer was emphatic that it used to be. From my viewpoint, if Raskin is correct, which I doubt on this for reasons I’ll get to, I don’t see what the reason is to keep an in depth cling on this and not to express more, to not make extra disclosure concerning the underlying data,” McCarthy argued, including:

As a result of if the ideas used to be checked out and the investigation used to be closed, you’re not in a state of affairs the place they might credibly say, if we let you know this, you’ll compromise an ongoing — information.

They’re left, I consider, pronouncing, But when we let you know, if we make public what the underlying grist of all that is, then folks will be capable of work out who this informant is, for the reason that information comes from any individual who the informant was speaking to.

And that would seem to me to be the one reputable concern that the FBI has. However as far as the timeline goes, I’m very suspicious about it, as a result of what Raskin is saying is they had a component to the FBI and the Justice Division that looked at this and decided not to, to not lift it to a higher stage of investigation. And eager about the timeline of this, that seems to be about precisely the time when the FBI and later the intelligence community tried to place a spin on the Biden family knowledge and the Hunter Biden laptop specifically, that we shouldn’t seem into this anymore because it’s simply Russian disinformation. And if that’s the rationale that they put the kibosh on this, if they did, which I’m skeptical about. That raises more questions than it answers.

Watch the entire clip above by way of Fox Information.

The publish ‘He Stated/He Said’: Reps. Comer and Raskin Supply ‘Contradicting Information’ on FBI Biden Investigation Letter first appeared on Mediaite.