Big apple prosecutors agreed Tuesday to not oppose delaying sentencing for former President Donald Trump’s prison convictions in order that the judge within the case can imagine Monday’s bombshell Supreme Court ruling granting presidents immunity for “reliable acts” committed while in place of work — despite the fact that the courtroom noted Trump’s arguments have been “with out benefit.”

The news used to be reported by way of ABC Information senior reporter Katherine Faulders who posted the letter despatched via the prosecutors to Decide Juan Merchan on X, formerly Twitter.

NEW – The Big apple DA’s office stated Tuesday it could now not oppose Trump’s request to file a movement arguing his conviction must be tossed, a move to be able to virtually indisputably prolong Trump’s sentencing, which is at the moment set for July 11. Reporting w/ @AaronKatersky & @PCCharalambous %twitter.com/z6VzU8L2ug

— Katherine Faulders (@KFaulders) July 2, 2024

Trump used to be convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business information to assist duvet up hush cash funds related to porn superstar Stormy Daniels and the 2016 presidential election. The former president used to be at the beginning scheduled to be sentenced on July 11th and faces as much as four years in prison, despite the fact that most observers consider he’s going to avoid jail.

Trump’s prison conviction pertains to acts taken ahead of his time in place of work, but his legal professionals still made the case that the Supreme Courtroom ruling must be regarded as. Trump himself posted on social media on Monday that each one his legal instances should be tossed because of the ruling, which does now not duvet either his categorized documents case or Georgia election interference case.

“Although the New york case does no longer center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or professional acts — but somewhat private process during his marketing campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time within the White Home. And underneath the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors now not handiest can’t cost a president for any respectable acts, but also can not cite proof involving authentic acts to bolster different accusations,” stated the New York Times on this problem.

It is a breaking story and will probably be up to date.

The put up JUST IN: NYC Prosecutors Agree to Lengthen Trump’s Sentencing After Bombshell Supreme Court Ruling first seemed on Mediaite.