Former Appearing Solicitor Normal Neal Katyal laid out the sheer audacity of former President Donald Trump’s “seven-fold” argument for why he will have to now not be prosecuted. The breakdown brought on MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell to make a crack about how “unreasonable” it sounds.

On Thursday, Manhattan Choose Juan Merchan rejected a motion from Trump’s attorneys to extend the start of his trial in New York, where the ex-president faces 34 prison counts of falsifying industry data to duvet up hush money funds in advance of the 2016 presidential election. Trump is also beneath indictment in Georgia for seeking to overturn the implications of the 2020 presidential election within the state, in federal court docket in Washington, D.C. for looking to overturn the election in a couple of states, and in federal court in Florida for maintaining executive paperwork upon leaving place of job.

Trump has claimed the prosecutions are politically influenced and has pleaded not guilty to all counts.

“A former president is facing a legal trial,” Katyal seen on Thursday’s adaptation of The Remaining Word. “It’s going to begin soon, Lawrence, on March 25th. Just to be mindful how important that is, Lawrence, simply overview the bidding:

Katyal then launched right into a review of Trump’s evolving arguments for why he should not be prosecuted and – in a single case – convicted in his 2021 impeachment trial in the U.S. Senate:

First, earlier than Donald Trump was president, he lied and hid his crimes, so he couldn’t be indicted then. And people crimes incorporated, as you simply showed on the display, trying to lie to cover some stuff so that he might win an election.

Second, he then becomes president and says he can’t be indicted for his past crimes while he’s a sitting president in place of job.

Third, he then commits more crimes in office… The Mueller Record lists 10 of them. And he says, “Hi there, which you can’t prosecute me for my crimes whereas I’m a sitting president.”

Fourth, he then will get voted out of place of work and he commits crimes to check out and stay in place of business. And he says, “I can’t be prosecuted whereas I’m president.”

So then, fifth, they are trying and impeach him and he gets impeached through the House of Representatives. After which he says he may also be convicted since the remedy is in truth to prosecute him after he leaves workplace. He shouldn’t be impeached.

Then, sixth, he leaves place of job and he’s prosecuted. And he says, “I can’t be prosecuted as a result of I was president on the time and I’m completely immune for acts I took while I was once president of the time.

After which, seventh, finally, for acts for when he wasn’t president, he’s now announcing he can’t be prosecuted for these either… as a result of he’s operating for president once more and is a presidential candidate.

Katyal then marveled at the boldness of Trump’s prison contentions.

“Altogether, chutzpah doesn’t commence to explain these claims,” he stated. “These are claims that the fellow can’t see straight. I imply, what constitution on Earth would permit that seven-fold roughly argument for absolute impunity? It’s a recipe for catastrophe.”

“Smartly, gee, Neal, while you put it that approach, it sounds roughly unreasonable,” O’Donnell joked.

Watch above by means of MSNBC.

The post Neal Katyal Deems Trump’s Legal Arguments ‘A Recipe for Catastrophe’ first regarded on Mediaite.