Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) advised in opposition to U.S. defense force action in Syria Wednesday morning all through an look on Chris Stigall’s Philadephia-based totally radio show. He stated “questions” remain on which side of the Syrian war used chemical weapons, saying, “there is a nice incentive for this to in fact have been launched by means of rebels, no longer the Syrian army.”

Paul fought again in opposition to tips from the White House that the Obama Administration might launch strikes against Syria with out congressional approval. “The Structure mandates that Congress declare battle, no longer the president.” He envisioned that President Obama would say “shedding a number of cruise missiles isn’t battle,” but said it the U.S. getting “extra concerned” can be almost inevitable.

“We’re no longer enjoying a recreation here,” Paul mentioned, arguing that intervention in Syria may steered a warfare with our “ally” Russia with whom we “went through 70 years heading off conflict.” He said “individuals need to assume these items through” before shifting forward with any action.

The senator then wondered the evaluate that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons in opposition to its personal civilians. “There are some questions,” Paul said. “It sounds an increasing number of like chemical weapons have been used, but there are some questions–and it should be investigated–who used them?”

Quoting Pat Buchanan, Paul requested, “Cui bono? To whose merit is that this? All of this redounds back to this is to the advantage of the rebels as a result of now it’s bringing other folks in on their side. So there is a nice incentive for this to in truth have been launched by way of rebels, now not the Syrian army.”

Listen to audio beneath, via [photo via Senate.gov]

–

>> Follow Matt Wilstein (@TheMattWilstein) on Twitter