Follow on Twitter
Subscribe by RSS
On Wednesday night, in an unique interview with NBC News reporter John Harwood, President Barack Obama warned insufficiently panicky monetary markets that they must be afraid. Nearly three days right into a executive shutdown, and with an excellent storm forming on the horizon during which Congress may head into negotiations over an increase of the debt ceiling in shutdown mode, Obama gave the impression to to find the relative calm of the American inventory market vexing.
Some pundits had been puzzled by way of the president’s admonition of the financial trade. Why would a President of the United States are looking for to encourage panic and tumult on Wall Boulevard? A number of concluded that this maneuver was once for political acquire, however most have remained silent. There used to be a duration, on the other hand, when conservatives and liberals may agree that spooking the markets for perceived political gain was once now not probably the most virtuous tactic.
On the evening of September 24, 2008, President George W. Bush addressed the nation concerning the deepening and expansive financial difficulty with which the nation continues to be coping. His frank deal with used to be most often well-bought, however a couple of political commentators saw his inciting distress as needless.
“Mostly, presidents in moments of national obstacle aim to reassure a frightened populace,” Salon’s Andrew Leonard wrote in September, 2008 just days after the stock market collapsed when the House didn’t move the primary iteration of the Troubled Belongings Reduction Software (TARP).
“[T]his was no time to channel the ghost of FDR and tell us that the only factor to concern is fear itself,” Leonard endured. “As a substitute, we had been informed that we should be apprehensive, that the ‘state of affairs is becoming more precarious with the aid of the day’ and that ‘the market shouldn’t be functioning correctly, there’s a in style loss of self assurance and main sectors of American trade are in peril of shutting down.’ Yikes.”
RELATED: Obama Warns of Financial Tumult: Markets ‘Should be Involved’
However Leonard cannot be faulted for his impact of Bush’s tackle. He was only taking the media’s protection of Obama’s speech to a logical conclusion. As The Columbia Journalism Evaluation seen, Bush’s tackle brought on the nationwide media to erupt in a frenzied refrain of hyperventilation over the quandary he was once addressing.
“‘Our whole economy is in danger,’ the president mentioned, earlier than outlining his proposals for getting us again to economic safety,” wrote CJR’s Megan Garber in 2008.
Such an admission—in danger, yikes—is highly odd coming from a sitting U.S. president; when the economic system is floundering, we usually expect game-going through and sanguine-making from our public figures despite (and because of) that very floundering.
Garber spent the rest of her publish scolding the front page editors of nearly each major U.S. e-newsletter for interpreting Bush’s deal with as an attraction to anxiousness.
The melodramatic “threat! threat!” headlines simply aren’t devoted to the overall argument of Bush’s speech. The ultimate message of remaining night’s handle was once this: “Our financial system is dealing with a second of serious challenge, however we’ve overcome difficult challenges ahead of, and we will overcome this one.” It was now not “we face a second of significant challenge,” the tip. It was not “Danger! Risk! Full stop!”
She used to be right. The media was eager to take Bush’s effort to calm the nation — and center of attention Congress on the duty of settling the markets — as an effort to spook the nation. However when Obama engages in an effort explicitly designed to incite a fear, the media is unmoved.
It would be an excessive amount of to look the nationwide press scold the president for nakedly trying to rattle monetary markets – as justified as that panic is also – basically as a result of it is the sort of departure from how previous presidents carried out themselves. But such an admission may detract from the based narrative which casts Republicans in Congress because the singular villains within the story of this newest executive shutdown.
[Photo via AP]
— –
