Follow on Twitter
Subscribe by RSS
Francis Chung/POLITICO by means of AP Images
The continued saga of Rep. George Santos (R-NY) has entered a whole new phase and it might spell more trouble for the freshman congressman.
Elected in November, Santos has because been published to be a serial liar as he has proven to have falsified a lot of his lifestyles story, together with his schooling and work histories, in addition to his (nonexistent) Jewish heritage and his mother working in the World Change Heart throughout the 9-11 attacks.
Now, it appears his marketing campaign mentioned donations from a couple of “individuals” who don’t in fact exist, consistent with a report printed Friday evening with the aid of Mother Jones:
In September 2020, George Santos’ congressional campaign suggested that Victoria and Jonathan Regor had each contributed $2,800—the maximum amount—to his first bid for a Home seat. Their listed address was 45 New Mexico Boulevard in Jackson Township, New Jersey.
A search of more than a few databases unearths nobody in the US named Victoria or Jonathan Regor. Moreover, there’s no person by way of any title residing at forty five New Mexico Street in Jackson. That address doesn’t exist. There is a New Mexico Street in Jackson, however the numbers end in the 20s, consistent with Google Maps and a resident of the road.
That’s no longer all. Mom Jones reported it could possibly not verify the existence of greater than a dozen supposed donors to Santos’ 2022 marketing campaign. That includes one benefactor listed as Stephen Berger:
Santos’ 2020 marketing campaign finance stories additionally list a donor named Stephen Berger as a $2,500 donor and stated he was a retiree who lived on Brandt Street in Brawley, California. But a spokesperson for William Brandt, a outstanding rancher and Republican donor, tells Mom Jones that Brandt has lived at that deal with for no less than 20 years and “neither he or his wife (the only different occupant [at the Brandt Road home]) have made any donations to George Santos. He does no longer know Stephen Berger nor has Stephen Berger ever lived at…Brandt Highway.”
As the newsletter noted, it’s illegal to make marketing campaign contributions under a false identify. Mother Jones suggested that more than $30,000 of the $338,000 the marketing campaign raised from folks got here from names whose veracities cannot be confirmed.
The record additional stated that of the 45 or so people who contributed the maximum amount of $2,800 to the campaign, 9 of those might not be contacted because nobody with those names are living at the addresses listed. Additionally, “None had ever contributed to a candidate sooner than sending Santos the utmost quantity allowed, according to FEC records.”
Mother Jones documented other instances of apparently sketchy donations, including one from a name that matches that of a Brazilian soccer player. If so, too, the listed address doesn’t exist.
In every other occasion, an alleged retiree who donated to Santos’ campaign has an deal with on the nonexistent “West Fingerboard Highway” in New York Metropolis.
The report comes the same day the Washington Post said that the Department of Justice asked the Federal Election Commission, which oversees campaign finance, to “grasp off on any enforcement motion” relating to Santos while it conducts a criminal investigation.
Apart from the lies about his biography, Santos faces critical questions about his budget. He loaned his marketing campaign $705,000 just two years after he stated no property and a $fifty five,000 earnings on a disclosure form in 2020.
The put up Several ‘Donors’ Listed by George Santos’ Campaign Don’t Seem to Exist, Consistent with an Investigation with the aid of Mom Jones first appeared on Mediaite.
