Supreme Court

AP Picture/Patrick Semansky, File

The marshal of the U.S. Supreme Court docket issued a remark Friday announcing she spoke with justices but didn’t ask them signal sworn affidavits all through the probe to establish who leaked the draft of a landmark opinion to Politico in May just.

The decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Girls’s Well being Organization, struck down Roe v. Wade and ruled that abortion is not a constitutionally secure right. The opinion overturned 49 years of precedent.

On Thursday, the court docket launched its report on the investigation and said that “it’s not possible to resolve the identity of any person who will have disclosed the document.”

The document says virtually 100 Supreme Courtroom workers have been interviewed as part of the probe. All of them denied leaking the draft opinion. However, it didn’t say whether the justices have been interviewed.

Marshal Gail Curley issued a observation on Friday and mentioned that justices were not asked to sign sworn affidavits, which other workers have been required to do:

All over the path of the investigation, I spoke with each and every of the Justices, a couple of on a couple of occasions. The Justices actively cooperated in this iterative course of, asking questions and answering mine. I followed up on all credible leads, none of which implicated the Justices or their spouses. On this basis, I didn’t consider that it was once important to ask the Justices to signal sworn affidavits.

Apparently, the commentary says the marshal “spoke with each and every of the Justices.” It does no longer use the term “interview” because the record does when describing interactions between investigators and court docket workers. That in all probability suggests the justices were treated so much otherwise in the investigations than different employees.

Slate creator Mark Joseph Stern, who covers the court docket, said the marshal’s reason behind now not asking justices to signal statements makes little sense. He tweeted:

The marshal’s justification for now not making the justices signal sworn affidavits is peculiar. She says no “credible leads … implicated the justices or their spouses.” OK, however unquestionably that was true of some of the different eighty two individuals who had been interviewed. But they needed to signal affidavits.

The publish Supreme Court docket Says Justices Weren’t Required to Sign Sworn Affidavits Like Different Staff in Leak Investigation first regarded on Mediaite.