Archive for: gops
Jake Tapper Asks GOP’s Nancy Mace How She Will Work with 9/11 Denier Marjorie Taylor Greene on Oversight Committee
CNN anchor Jake Tapper pressed Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) on whether or now not she believes she will effectively work with one-time Sept. 11 denier and known conspiracy theorist Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) on the House Oversight Committee. “I need to ask you, because you’re on the Oversight Committee, […]
/ TODAY
Trump Blames GOP’s Handling of ‘Abortion Issue’ for Lackluster Midterms: ‘It Wasn’t My Fault’
Former President Donald Trump bragged about his endorsement report and blamed the “abortion difficulty” after Republicans underperformed within the 2022 midterms. Trump started out 2023 Sunday on a tear in opposition to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and voters he mentioned “disappeared” after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. […]
/ TODAY
How GOP’s path to majority in U.S. House got an assist from Florida — and Gov. Ron DeSantis
Without a purple wave in Tuesday’s midterm election, the path to a Republican majority within the chamber, at present a projection, indeed cuts thru Florida. &#a hundred and sixty; &#one hundred sixty;
GOP’s Mastriano Tells Dick Morris Why He Must Win For Trump to Come Back in 2024: ‘I Get to Appoint the Secretary of State’
Newsmax host Dick Morris interviewed Republican nominee for governor of Pennsylvania Doug Mastriano over the weekend and the two agreed that Mastriano successful in November is so essential for former President Donald Trump to make a comeback as a result of as governor he gets to appoint the secretary of state, […]
/ TODAY
Exclusive: Democrat Fetterman hangs onto 6-point lead over GOP’s Dr. Oz in Pennsylvania Senate race
/ Politics
Mitch McConnell cautious on GOP’s odds of taking Senate in midterms, rebukes threats to FBI
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell stated he thought the probabilities of the GOP taking the House have been larger than the celebration’s odds within the Senate. &#one hundred sixty;&#one hundred sixty;&#one hundred sixty;&#one hundred sixty;