Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) tore into EPA Administrator Michael Regan on Wednesday throughout an awfully demanding House Oversight hearing, during which a Democrat accused Higgins of McCathy-like techniques.
“If you are involved in regards to the ecological affect of mankind upon your planet and that mankind is going to consume petrochemical merchandise, then you might need it produced in the region of the earth the place it’s produced the cleanest, below essentially the most stringent regulations and probably the most industry-pushed technological advancement to ship clean, affordable product. That’s the USA of The us,” Higgins started most often sufficient, before training his hearth on Regan:
Men like Mr. Regan. Have carried a torch. 100%, driven via an agenda to smash the American energy business. He’s the person who’s agenda-pushed, no longer me. The American energy industry and the American petrochemical business is, without a debate, the cleanest producer of affordable energy product and affordable petrochemical product on the planet. And every body of you devour it. Personal that. As a result of that’s where we’re. At some point. I haven’t any doubt that there can be a gradual transition to things unknown. That is the character of life. That is the way issues roll.
But to have an agenda-driven, Green New Deal, anti-American, anti-American power, anti-American petrochemical agenda shoved down our throat. By an administration that claims its doing so on behalf of shielding the world’s ecological steadiness. By means of forcing the manufacturing of those merchandise into regions of the arena that have far less issue about their ecological impact. That is hypocrisy at its worst. And I, for one, am going to make use of every authority that Congress lets in me to legally wield to thrust back towards it. Mr. Chairman, I ask for unanimous consent to enter into the report the joint resolution 161, a joint resolution calling for the reversal of the EPA rule. Submitted by this gentleman and his division without a unanimous consent.
Higgins ultimately bought around to questioning Regan and asked, “What’s your plans for next yr?”
Regan responded, “Smartly, my plans are non-public.”
As the two spoke over each and every different, Higgins clarified, “Professionally, do you might have plans to continue your combat?”
Throughout the crosstalk Regan made clear he didn’t plan to answer given Higgins’s assaults on him. Regan could be heard saying, “With you simply, assaulting me and announcing I’m un-American.”
“Suppose this used to be an assault?” Higgins replied menacingly.
“Now, you want to grasp what my plans,” Regan replied as Higgins cut in, “We surely dwelling in two completely different worlds. Oh, yeah.”
Rep. Kweisi Mfume (D-MD) jumped in with an inquiry and used to be identified.
“Mr. Chairman, we disagree on a number of concerns in this committee quite a lot of instances, however we always ought to seem and put a stop sign up entrance of ourselves once we begin assailing through identify the personal integrity of any witness. I’ve talked about this a few weeks ago with Mr. Fauci. It continues to happen. I need to make certain I’m on the file, so that members of the committee on either side of the aisle, well, as a minimum recognize the non-public integrity of a witness earlier than this committee,” Mfume fumed.
After some extra back and forth, Higgins brought, “This is the Oversight Committee. That is where government is compelled to sit in front of Congress and be held responsible for his or her movements.”
“Mr. Chairman? However it’s now not. It’s not the McCarthy generation. It’s not the McCarthy Committee!” Mfume hit back, referring to Higgins questioning Regan’s patriotism.
Watch above by way of C-SPAN.
The put up ‘Think This Used to be An Assault?’ Listening to Derails After Republican Calls Biden Legit ‘Anti-American’ And Is Accused of McCarthyism first regarded on Mediaite.