Baseball, P. (2000). In P. Basketball, H. F. Spirer, & L. Spirer (Eds.), Determining to make the Situations: Exploring Main Folks Legal rights Violations Using Recommendation Prospects and you are going to Prognosis Diagnosis. AAAS.

Belin, T. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). A method getting calibrating unfaithful-suits cost for the checklist linkage. Journal of Western Statistical Affiliation, ninety(430), 694–707.

Bilenko, Meters., & Mooney, R. J. (2003). Adaptive Replica Recognition Having fun with Learnable Sequence Resemblance Steps. All through the KDD ’03 (pp. 39–forty eight). ACM.

Christen, P. (2008). Automated Checklist Linkage Taking part in with Seeded Nearest Neighbor and which you can Assist Vector Desktop Class. Inside KDD ’08 (pp. 151–159). ACM.

Christen, P. (2012). A survey from indexing techniques for scalable checklist linkage and deduplication. IEEE Transactions on Schooling and you may Analysis Programs, 24(9), 1537–1555.

Cohen, W., Raviku). An evaluation far from sequence metrics for coordinating manufacturers and data. withIn the KDD working house for the analysis cleanup and object consolidation (Vol. step three, pp. 73–seventy eight).

Copas, J., & Hilton, F. (1990). File linkage: Statistical habits to own complimentary computers ideas. Record of your individual Regal Mathematical House, Collection A beneficial, 153(three), 287–320.

Dai, An efficient. M., & Storkey, A. J. (2011). The fresh new categorised journalist-material version to own unsupervised organization resolution. Inside the Artificial sensory networks and you can server training–icann 2011 (pp internationalwomen.internet home. 241–249). Springer.

Fortini, Meters., Liseo, B., Nuccitelli, A fantastic., & Scanu, Meters. (2001). With the Bayesian File Linkage. Seem to be all the way through the Licensed Data, four(1), 185–198.

Gutman, Roentgen., Afendulis, C., & Zaslavsky, An effective. (2013). Excellent bayesian procedure for report hooking up to analyze end- of-existence clinical can cost you. Report of the American Analytical Connection, 108(501), 34–47.

Hsu, W., Lee, Meters. L., Liu, B., & Ling, T. W. (2000). Exploration Exploration in the Diabetics Databases: Outcomes and you may also Conclusions. Inside KDD ’00 (pp. 430–436). ACM.

A torn-mix Markov strings Monte Carlo manner of the brand new Dirichlet process combination version

Jewell, N. P., Spagat, Meters., & Jewell, B. L. (2013). MSE and Casualty Counts: Presumptions, Interpretation, and Demands. For the T. B. Seybolt, J. D. Aronson, & B. Fischhoff (Eds.), Relying Civil Casualties: An introduction to Recording and you’re going to Quoting Nonmilitary Deaths incompatible. Oxford, UK: Oxford Faculty Press.

Larsen, M. D. (2002)ments in opposition to Hierarchical Bayesian Report Linkage. Inside the Court cases of your own shared statistical staff conferences, part on survey appear movements (pp. 1995–2000). The recent American Mathematical Connection.

Steorts, Roentgen

Larsen, Yards. D. (2005). Advances inside the Number Linkage Conception: Hierarchical Bayesian Listing Linkage Idea. Whilst you take a look at the Tactics of your personal shared statistical meetings, house to your questionnaire look processes (pp. 3277–3284). Model new American Mathematical Connection.

Larsen, M. D., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Iterative automatic checklist linkage using mixture designs. Log of 1′s American Analytical Group, ninety six(453), 32–41.

Lum, K., Value, Yards. Age., & Banking corporations, D. (2013). Instrument concerning Multiple Options Quote in Person Prison rights Search. The Western Statistician, 67(4), 191–2 hundred.

Marchant, N. Grams., C., Kaplan, An excellent., Rubinstein, B. We. P., & Elazar, D. Letter. (2019). D-blink: Marketed stop-to-end bayesian entity resolution.

McCallum, An incredible., & Wellner, B. (2004). Conditional Different types of Id Suspicion which have Device with a purpose to Noun Coreference. Into the Improves in sensory knowledge regulate potentialities (nips ’04) (pp. 905–912). MIT Force.

Miller, P. L., Frawley, S. J., & Sayward, F. Grams. (2000). IMM/Scrub: A site-Specific Product with the Deduplication from Inoculation Heritage Information all through the Childhood Immunization Registriesputers and you may Biomedical Search, 33(2), 126–143.

Murphy, J., Brackbill, Roentgen. Meters., Thalji, L., Dolan, M., Pulliam, P., & Walker, D. J. (2007). Measuring and you’re going to Improving Publicity all over the place the world Alternate Middle Well being Registry. Records into the Medicine, 26(8), 1688–1701.

Murray, J. S. (2016). Probabilistic number linkage and you may also deduplication once indexing, blockading, and that you could choice. Log from Confidentiality and that you could Confidentiality, 7(1), 3–24.

Newcombe, H. B., Kennedy, J. M., Axford, S. J., & James, A just right. P. (1959). Automated linkage from public record information hosts can be utilized to drag” follow-up” facts from oldsters out of data far from techniques small print. Science, a hundred thirty(3381), 954–959.

Sadinle, Meters. (2014). Discovering Duplicates within a homicide Registry Using a great Bayesian Partitioning Strategy. Annals of Used Analytics, 8(four), 2404–2434.

Sariyar, Yards., Borg, A., & Pommerening, oK. (2012). Vigorous Discovering Methods for brand new Deduplication relating to Digital Diligent Investigation Playing with Type Woods. Diary from Biomedical Informatics, 45(5), 893–900.

C., Hallway, Roentgen., & Fienberg, S. Age. (2016). An incredible Bayesian Solution to Graphical checkList Linkage and you will Deduplication. Journal of one’s Western Statistical Relationship, 111(516), 1660–1672.

Tancredi, An awesome., & Liseo, B. (2011). A perfect hierarchical Bayesian approach of list linkage and that you would be able to people dimensions problems. Annals regarding Applied Records, 5(2B), 1553–1585.