CNN’s Jake Tapper and Jeff Zeleny spent a few minutes handicapping the Donald Trump “veepstakes” on Monday’s version of The Lead, when the conversation turned to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL).

Hypothesis abounds as to whom Trump – the presumptive Republican presidential nominee – will make a choice as his operating mate. The shortlist reportedly includes Rubio.

“They fought every different for the Republican nomination,” Tapper noted of the senator and Trump in 2016.

“All of us remember those fiery debates when the 2 would stand on stage,” Zeleny mentioned. “And Marco Rubio, on the time, took nice pleasure in making enjoyable of Donald Trump. All that’s previously.”

He referred to that the former hosted Rubio and his wife for dinner at the White House.

“There’s no one who has been on the report a lot in opposition to Trump who has utterly changed his tune,” Zeleny said. “He is completely a powerful defender of Donald Trump.”

Zeleny stated that like Trump, Rubio also resides in Florida. He then repeated a well-liked misconception that it is unconstitutional for a president and the vp to be from the same state.

“One challenge, of course, he is a resident of Florida,” Zeleny said. “Trump, also a resident of Florida. The Structure essentially prohibits that. It’s no longer been attested. Would he move someplace else? Would Trump ignore that?”

“Yeah, I do keep in mind that when Bush picked Cheney, they were each Texas residents, and Cheney just moved again to his residence state of Wyoming,” Tapper said. “Theoretically, I assume Trump might move to New York simply because Marco Rubio doesn’t have anywhere to maneuver again to.”

“I don’t think Trump’s transferring any place, though,” Zeleny mentioned. “That’s the query. Is Rubio going to move in other places?”

The constitutional provision in query is the Twelfth Modification, which does no longer impose a residency requirement on presidential tickets. Rather, it states that presidential electors can’t cast a ballot for a couple of one who is from their own state.

“The electors shall meet of their respective states and vote by means of pollfor President and Vice-President, considered one of whom, as a minimum, shall not be an inhabitant of the identical state with themselves,” the modification reads.

This might imply that if Trump chooses Rubio and neither moves his residence outside of Florida, the state’s 30 electors could most effective cast ballots for Trump or Rubio, however now not both.

Florida went for Trump in 2016 and 2020.

Watch above by way of CNN.

The put up ‘Would Trump Ignore That?’ Vague Constitutional Provision Involves the Fore as Ex-President Mulls Rubio for Working Mate first seemed on Mediaite.